League Updates

In Memorium: A Box of Surprises

Memorial Day is for remembering our dead. (No, Kent Hrbek isn’t dead. He’s got a bit part in this post.)

My dad is most prominent in my mind today, his death being only a little more than two years ago.  But Dad wasn’t a baseball fan.  He got dragged to a few games, never on his own initiative, never grumbling, just along for the ride.

I remember one game, in Detroit in the early 1980’s. We were high up in the second deck in the old Tiger Stadium, along the first base line, in a game against the Twins. The only play I remember was a Kent Hrbek homer down the right field line that reached the third deck, a sort of narrow porch in front of a row of abandoned little rooms just under the roof.   The only other thing I remember is something Dad said, out of the blue, after that blast: “Baseball is mostly a box of surprises.”

He was right, except.  Right, because the crux of the game is the pitch and the bat.  Neither the pitcher nor the batter can completely control what happens there.  Chance is the biggest factor in each outcome. This is why we remember Babe Ruth’s mythic “called shot” 90 years later. He seemed to defy the effects of randomness to predict the unpredictable. Even he couldn’t hit a homer on demand. He had 10,616 plate appearances. Let’s say he faced 4 pitches per plate appearance, that would be over 40,000 pitches.  He hit 714 home runs. He hit home runs on fewer than 1.8% of the pitches he faced. If he had called a homer on every pitch, he’d have failed more than 98% of the time. If we cut him some slack and only held him to his called homers in each plate appearance, he still failed about 93% of the time.

Even for Babe Ruth, each homer was a surprise. Not as surprising as each of Maury Wills’ 20 homers in 8304 PA — a failure rate of 99.8%. But Babe Ruth’s plate appearances were still a box of surprises.

Dad was right, except he didn’t articulate what makes the game so interesting.  We are watching professionals struggle to bend the laws of chance, to get a few more of the surprises to come out their way. The pitcher wants his pitches to be just a bit more effective than random.  The batter wants his swings (or takes) to bring a skoosh better than random results.  Fielders try to catch better than randomly, and make throws better than randomly correlated with their targets. The team behind by 5 runs in the ninth is trying to do what 99.5% of those who have gone before have failed to do. They are trying to be one of the 0.5%.

And when they succeed, it feels like they made it happen.  We treat the events as pure will applied with outstanding skill.  And there IS skill involved: the Yankees have a pattern over the last 100 years of doing better at bending the laws of chance than the Mariners do.  But it takes a gargantuan effort (or at least intelligent use of a gargantuan pile of money as compared to your rivals) to make that happen a little more often than average. Baseball is a box of surprises mostly, but it is also the spectacle of people so good at what they do that they can bend the laws of probability ever so slightly in their own favor, delivering surprises fast enough to make us notice how amazing they are.

.

EFL
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB RS RA
Portland Rosebuds 34 19 .645 322.6 239.3
Flint Hill Tornadoes 33 19 .633 0.7 331.5 252.1
Old Detroit Wolverines 30 22 .576 3.7 296.5 249.5
Canberra Kangaroos 30 23 .566 4.2 297.3 259.4
Peshastin Pears 28 25 .534 5.9 268.2 251.1
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 27 25 .521 6.6 241.6 231.2
Kaline Drive 28 26 .511 7.1 222.1 215.8
Bellingham Cascades 23 29 .438 10.9 254.0 291.2
Haviland Dragons 24 30 .438 11 248.6 281.6
Cottage Cheese 22 29 .430 11.3 249.2 287.1
Brookland Outs 21 30 .420 11.7 250.6 295.6
D.C. Balk 20 33 .368 14.7 219.5 288.3
.
Portland: “L”, 5 – 5. (42 PA, .275, .356, .350;  17 ip, 8 er, 4.24 ERA).  The Rosebuds had two starting pitchers going yesterday, both of whom completed exactly 6.3 innings.  German Marquez surrendered 4 earned runs.  Brett Anderson only gave up 1.  These may have been random results, with Marquez’ box of surprise fully of booby prizes.  On the other hand, Anderson was pitching to the woeful Mariners. Since they were 13-2, the M’s have been 10 – 30, and 1 – 9 in their last ten games.  The Mariners are the worst team in baseball right now, by quite a margin — the Detroit Tigers possibly excepted.
.
Flint Hill: W 2, L (-1); 19 – 6. (35 PA, .500, .600, 1.179;  1.3 ip, 0, 0.00 ERA).  Austin Meadows went 4 for 4 with a double and a homer (and a hbp to foil his chance to get a triple and a cycle). And Mike Trout, shamed in these pages yesterday for an 0 for 4, redeemed himself with a 2 for 3 with a homer, double, and walk of his own.   Along with three other batters who homered and OPSed over 1.000, the Tornados reveled in a rare double win and narrowed their deficit in the standings to 0.7 games.
.
Old Detroit: W, 7 – 4. (51 PA, .255, .314, .511; 6 ip, 2 er, 3 ERA).   MLB has an article up on 9 players who seem to be having breakout years.  Two of The Nine are Wolverines.  Josh Bell has been getting rave reviews for weeks now.  So when he returned to normal for a day ( 1 for 4 with a walk) it seemed like a bad surprise.  By there was Rafael Devers, another of The Nine,  ready to fill in — living up to his MLB-endorsed reputation as a breakthrough against randomness by simply converting Bell’s walk to a homer. (Willson Contreras and did the same, but he’s not one of the 9 special breakouts like Bell and Devers are.  Jorge Soler did the same, except he also kept the walk, but he’s not one of The Nine, either.Bryan Reynolds did the same, except it took him an extra PA and he didn’t walk, but he’s not one of The Nine, either.)  Adding to the numinous air around the W’s:  Andrew Heaney finally came back from his latest IL stint, pitching 5 effective innings (2 er).
.
Canberra:  L, 3 – 6. (32 PA, .069, .156, .103; 2 ip, 0 er, 0 ERA).  Look, Canberra: if we are going to jointly assault the Johnson Gang atop our league, we can’t have this .069 batting average stuff.  I know batting average is a weak stat, but a weak performance in a weak stat often (as it did yesterday) indicate weak hitting. You only got 2 hits!  Talk about surprises! Six guys were hitless in at least 4 plate appearances!  If the W’s and the K’s are going to play leapfrog like they have the last two days, could we at least leap-frog forward rather than backward?
.  
Peshastin: L, 5 – 7.  (57 PA, .288, .345, .365; 9.7 ip, 3 er, 2.79 ERA).  Pear Zach Eflin is another one of The Nine players experiencing breakout seasons… except Eflin’s breakout broke down yesterday in a 3.7 ip, 3 er performance, in which he served up two homers, one of them to the Tornados’ Yasmani Grandal.  Jack Flaherty put in a scoreless 6 innings to help correct matters, and Cam Bedrosian’s 8 innings of 3 er pitching this month got accidentally overwritten today.  I can fix the latter problem in tomorrow’s update. (Commissioner errors: another reliable layer of random results we have to contend with in this league.)  On the other hand Joey Gallo is also one of The Nine.  He went 0 for 2 — but took three walks Sunday, so that was at least somewhat impressive.
.
Pittsburgh: L, 2 – 7. (32 PA, .172, .250, .207; 6 ip, 4 er, 6.00 ERA). I was surprised not to see Byron Buxton among The Nine breakout players in the MLB.com article.  I guess a good (.817 OPS) but not stellar May has taken him out of The Nine for the moment.
.
Kaline: “W”, 2 – 4. (42 PA, .225, .262, .275; 14 ip, 6 er, 3.86 ERA).  The ERA is fine for a contender, but the offense was off a little too much to earn a real win.  Still, the Drive are gradually moving further into plus-.500 territory.
Bellingham:  W, 12 – 8. (38 PA, .424, .500, .576; no pitching).  The Cascades keep surprising, this time with their resilience.  They had sunk to 10th -place but a strong offensive performance lifted them to 8th. Justin Turner led the way — that’s not really a surprise, he does that a lot.  But this time he led with 5 singles in 5 AB, plus a walk.  Is it a surprise that Bryce Harper went only 0 for 3 with 3 k’s?
.
Haviland: W (-1), L 2:  2 – 15. (38 PA, .162, .184, .189; 5.7 ip, 11 er, 17.47 ERA).  This is a terrible surprise.  The discouraged Dragons might be convinced it’s totally predictable, but Vince Velasquez sextuple chulking is not expected. Nor is Domingo German giving up 7 runs in only 5 innings,  on the same day that the Dragon offense takes a nap…
.
Cottage:  “W”, 4 – 5. (28 PA, .231, .267, .462; 7.7 ip, 4 er, 4.70 ERA). Corey Seager is back, which is a good thing, and he homered and walked to join Nick Castellanos as the two Cheeses above 1.000 OPS.  They didn’t get much help from anyone else, so the offense fell just a bit short of a true win.  Danny Duffy, the One Man Box of Surprises, continued his Jekyll/Hyde existence, this time on the Dr. Jekyll side (that’s the good one, right?) with 6 ip, 1 er.
.
Brookland: “L”, 8 – 4. (44 PA, .341, .364, .561; 2 ip, 0 er , 0 ERA).  The Outs didn’t live up to their name all that well.  They only offered enough pitching to get 6 outs while allowing only 1 run. On the batting side they eventually did supply 27 outs, but only after going 14 for 41 with six double and a homer. They clearly surprised the database, which awarded the Outs a loss apparently out of habit. But that’s not how baseball works! You can’t let yourself be so surprised you miss seeing it.
.
DC: W, 8 – 7. (43 PA, .289, .349, .901;  1 IP, 0 er, 0.00 ERA). You can build a .264 ISO out of two homers and 4 doubles in 38 AB.. Huh. I guess there were 7 Outs with OPSes of 1.000 or better.
 .
Combined MLB + EFL Standings for 2019
AL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
New York Yankees 34 18 .654
Flint Hill Tornadoes 33 19 .633 1.1
Tampa Bay Rays 31 19 .620 2
Old Detroit Wolverines 30 22 .576 4
Boston Red Sox 28 25 .528 6.5
Toronto Blue Jays 21 32 .396 13.5
Baltimore Orioles 16 37 .302 18.5
NL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Philadelphia Phillies 31 22 .585
Canberra Kangaroos 30 23 .566 1
Atlanta Braves 30 24 .556 1.5
New York Mets 26 26 .500 4.5
Washington Nationals 22 31 .415 9
D.C. Balk 20 33 .368 11.5
Miami Marlins 16 34 .320 13.5
AL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Minnesota Twins 36 16 .692
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 27 25 .521 8.9
Cleveland Indians 26 26 .500 10
Chicago White Sox 23 29 .442 13
Bellingham Cascades 23 29 .438 13.2
Detroit Tigers 19 31 .380 16
Kansas City Royals 18 34 .346 18
NL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Chicago Cubs 30 21 .588
Milwaukee Brewers 30 24 .556 1.5
Pittsburgh Pirates 25 25 .500 4.5
St. Louis Cardinals 26 26 .500 4.5
Cincinnati Reds 24 28 .462 6.5
Cottage Cheese 22 29 .430 8.1
Brookland Outs 21 30 .420 8.6
AL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Houston Astros 35 19 .648
Oakland A’s 28 25 .528 6.5
Kaline Drive 28 26 .511 7.4
Texas Rangers 25 25 .500 8
Los Angeles Angels 24 28 .462 10
Haviland Dragons 24 30 .438 11.3
Seattle Mariners 23 32 .418 12.5
NL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Los Angeles Dodgers 35 18 .660
Portland Rosebuds 34 19 .645 0.8
Peshastin Pears 28 25 .534 6.7
San Diego Padres 28 25 .528 7
Arizona Diamondbacks 28 25 .528 7
Colorado Rockies 24 27 .471 10
San Francisco Giants 21 31 .404 13.5