League Updates

Ruthless Pears Pass ‘Roos, Kindly ‘Buds Catch W’s (and D’s?)

The Pears’ relentless rise through the standings continued Wednesday when they overtook the slowly fading Kangaroos.  This wasn’t necessary.  We are not playing a strict zero-sum game.  The Pears could have risen without a corresponding Kangaroo decline.

Consider the Rosebuds. Yesterday they rose, bud, into a tie for second place (by GB) with a team tied for first place (winning percentage). So if PR=OD and OD=HD, then PR=HD, right? That’s the transitive principle or something. I remember doing proofs back about 45 years ago involving this principle. Anyway, the Rosebuds rose elegantly without making anyone else descend.

Or consider the Tornadoes, who have been content to spin in place at or just above .500.  Tornadoes cannot deny their essential nature as spinning vortices of wind.  They apparently have realized how destructive uncontrolled windiness is, and have charitably decided to limit the damage they do by not traveling across the landscape of our standings.  Such kindliness in a Tornado, with such ruthlessness in a Pear.  Someone should paint that still life (of a tornado?) to capture the inspiring twisted twister.

EFL Standings for 2016
EFL
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB RS RA
Haviland Dragons 61 35 .631 470.0 362.6
Old Detroit Wolverines 58 34 .631 0.5 493.5 375.2
Portland Rosebuds 60 35 .627 0.5 502.3 380.7
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 56 38 .591 4 509.7 422.9
Peshastin Pears 52 43 .547 8.1 448.6 399.0
Canberra Kangaroos 52 43 .544 8.4 455.0 413.0
Flint Hill Tornadoes 46 46 .502 12.4 394.6 392.2
Cottage Cheese 45 49 .478 14.7 452.1 468.3
Kaline Drive 40 56 .416 20.7 468.1 555.7
D.C. Balk 32 63 .335 28.3 373.6 533.2
Haviland:  W, 0.5 – 0.5.
Old Detroit:  DNP,  1 – 0.
Portland: W, 10 – 4.
Pittsburgh: “W”, 0 – 6. This has to be the most egregious phony win of all time.
Peshastin: W, 13 – 3.
Canberra: W, 7 – 5.
Flint Hill: DNP, 1 – 0.
Cottage:  W, 8 – 7.
Kaline: W, 8 – 5.
D.C.: W, 5 – 5.   See? If we cooperate, everyone either wins, or “wins”, or doesn’t play.  It’s all positive sum .  Just don’t let the Commissioner catch us all winning, or he’ll want to change the rules to make the game harder (or “more realistic” as he so quaintly puts it).
AL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Old Detroit Wolverines 58 34 .631
Boston Red Sox 53 39 .576 5.1
Baltimore Orioles 53 40 .570 5.6
Toronto Blue Jays 54 42 .563 6.1
New York Yankees 48 46 .511 11.1
Flint Hill Tornadoes 46 46 .502 11.9
Tampa Bay Rays 37 57 .394 22.1
NL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Washington Nationals 57 38 .600
Canberra Kangaroos 52 43 .544 5.3
Miami Marlins 51 43 .543 5.5
New York Mets 50 44 .532 6.5
Philadelphia Phillies 44 52 .458 13.5
Atlanta Braves 33 62 .347 24
D.C. Balk 32 63 .335 25.2
AL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Cleveland Indians 56 38 .596
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 56 38 .591 0.4
Detroit Tigers 49 46 .516 7.5
Kansas City Royals 47 47 .500 9
Chicago White Sox 46 48 .489 10
Minnesota Twins 35 59 .372 21
NL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Chicago Cubs 57 37 .606
St. Louis Cardinals 50 44 .532 7
Pittsburgh Pirates 48 46 .511 9
Cottage Cheese 45 49 .478 12.1
Milwaukee Brewers 40 52 .435 16
Cincinnati Reds 36 59 .379 21.5
AL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Haviland Dragons 61 35 .631
Texas Rangers 55 41 .573 5.6
Houston Astros 51 44 .537 9.1
Seattle Mariners 48 47 .505 12.1
Oakland A’s 42 52 .447 17.6
Los Angeles Angels 42 53 .442 18.1
Kaline Drive 40 56 .416 20.7
NL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Portland Rosebuds 60 35 .627
San Francisco Giants 57 38 .600 2.6
Los Angeles Dodgers 53 43 .552 7.1
Peshastin Pears 52 43 .547 7.7
Colorado Rockies 43 51 .457 16.1
San Diego Padres 41 54 .432 18.6
Arizona Diamondbacks 40 55 .421 19.6

 

 

 

1 Comment

  • “ruthless”? I wonder. How ruthless can you be while in 5th place? Besides, what is this “ruth” stuff? Has anyone ever been ruthful? The Pears have lots of ruth, whatever it is.