League Updates

Alliterative Initials (or, A Day in the Life of Jamie Johnson)

“Psychologists call it, ‘implicit ego,'” I say as I saunter up to you at the next EFL manager’s meeting. Uncertain you want to hear any more, but willing to humor me, you offer, “I’m listening, go ahead.”

“You know, when you find yourself drawn to things that are, generally speaking, like you. Some studies have focused on how this shows up in our attraction to other people. For instance, these studies say that the letters in your name will often strongly correlate to the letters in the name of the person to whom you are attracted.”

In disbelief, you utter, “That sounds crazy!”

“I know it does,” I counter. “But consider this: I married a wonderful woman whose name is Erin Oates. In her name are 8 different letters, all of them included in my full name, Jamie Robert Johnson.”

“That’s just one example, and you are…” You search for a way to politely say, “crazy,” but choose to say, “unique,” which can be interpreted positively but you intend for it to sting just a little.

Before you can offer any counter arguments, I carry on. “Have you ever noticed how many celebrities have alliterative initials? You know, like Jamie Johnson?”

You answer that, no, you haven’t really noticed, and you aren’t really sure where this conversation is going, but you know you want it to end soon.

“How can you not? They are everywhere! Look at the Marvel Universe – Lois Lane, Peter Parker, Silver Surfer, Wade Wilson. There are even websites devoted to this phenomenon. Do you know the name of the newest Spiderman?”

“Miles Morales,” you say. I shout, “Bingo!” Your face demonstrates alarm at how excited your answer makes me.

I see your eyes wander off, as though lost in thought, and I interpret that to mean I’ve begun to win you over. Instead, you begin to daydream about this conversation ending, remembering that the new Spiderman featuring Miles Morales is now on Netflix, and how much more enjoyable it would be watching it than sitting here and listening to me prattle on about inconsequential inanities.

I take your silence to mean you want more proof. “Or what about all the actors who have alliterative initials? Alan Alda, Janet Jackson, Lindsay Lohan, Charlie Chaplin, Danny Devito…”

I am now convinced that I have won you over.

Instead you say, “I can see this is very important to you,” and you pat me on the head like you would a small child who won’t stop talking about her favorite Disney show, though you really wish she would.

I search through the catalogues of useful information about this phenomenon that I have collected over the years, seeking something that will help you connect. And then it hits me, “Baseball!” I say out loud.

Seemingly an opportunity to change the subject you say, “Yes! Did you see Aaron Boone’s tirade yesterday?” But I don’t hear you. Instead I say, “Stephen Strasburg and Charlie Culberson!”

Burying your face in your hands, you know where this is going.

“Two of the coolest things in baseball yesterday were done by two guys with alliterative initials! And it happened in the same game! Stephen Strasburg, the Nationals star pitcher, doubled the amount of hits he has had all season. He came into game having earned 3 hits in 41 ABs, and last night he went 3 for 3, with a HR and 5 RBI. How cool is that? And then later in the same game, Charlie Culberson, the 30 year old journeyman infielder, came in to pitch and pitched a scoreless inning against a team that had touched up a good Braves pitching staff for 13 runs!”

You nod, and say, “That is pretty neat. Maybe there is something to this phenomenon. Oh! Didn’t Freddie Freeman and Touki Toussaint also play for the Braves? If this theory holds true, then I bet they also had amazing games last night.”

I chuckle nervously, knowing that Freeman and Toussaint actually had pretty bad games. But before he can open his MLB app and check the box score, I say, “See, alliterative initials are the overlooked secret to greatness. I’m glad I could convince you.”

You turn around and notice that, much to your surprise, there are three people waiting to talk to you after overhearing your conversation with me – the owners of the Cottage Cheese, the Peshastin Pears, and John Johnson, himself. Sensing what might happen next, and knowing that one more minute of having to hear about the “importance” of alliterative initials, you say out loud for all to hear, “Oh, look. My wife is here to pick me up.”

And then you realize what you had missed this whole time. TheĀ most important person in the world to you, the one you love with every fiber of your being, is named Melanie Mock. “Maybe Jamie is on to something,” you mutter under your breath. And the last thing everyone hears you say is, “Stinking Pickles.”

________________

(Ron’s added note: Mary Mock is Melanie Mock’s mother in law. Melissa Mock is Mary’s granddaughter. Your character has been aware of the greatness of alliteratively-named women for decades. However, for men, he is still open to persuasion.)

EFL
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB RS RA
Portland Rosebuds 64 35 .650 593.0 435.4
Flint Hill Tornadoes 60 35 .628 2.7 599.3 457.5
Old Detroit Wolverines 56 39 .589 6.3 554.4 460.3
Haviland Dragons 52 46 .526 12.3 546.1 499.9
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 49 46 .514 13.5 449.7 436.5
Canberra Kangaroos 50 48 .506 14.2 544.7 540.5
Peshastin Pears 50 49 .503 14.5 517.8 516.1
Kaline Drive 48 50 .492 15.6 454.8 462.4
Cottage Cheese 45 51 .466 18.1 559.7 585.6
Bellingham Cascades 43 52 .451 19.5 453.3 504.2
Brookland Outs 38 58 .400 24.4 471.1 580.2
D.C. Balk 37 61 .373 27.3 437.5 566.5

The stats uploaded so late I don’t have time to provide stats – sorry!

Portland: W, 10-0

Flint Hill: W 2, L 0; 15-9

Old Detroit: W 2, L 0; 11-3

Haviland: W, 12-3

Pittsburgh: L, 1-6

Canberra: W, 9-9

Peshastin: W, 3 – (-1)

Kaline: L, (-1)-6

Cottage: DNP, 2-1

Bellingham: W, 4-3

Brookland: W (-1), L 1; (-3)-(-1)

DC: “W,” 2-4

Combined MLB + EFL Standings for 2014
AL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
New York Yankees 62 33 .653
Flint Hill Tornadoes 60 35 .628 2.3
Old Detroit Wolverines 56 39 .589 6
Tampa Bay Rays 56 43 .566 8
Boston Red Sox 53 44 .546 10
Toronto Blue Jays 36 62 .367 27.5
Baltimore Orioles 30 66 .313 32.5
NL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Atlanta Braves 58 40 .592
Washington Nationals 51 44 .537 5.5
Philadelphia Phillies 50 47 .515 7.5
Canberra Kangaroos 50 48 .506 8.4
New York Mets 44 52 .458 13
Miami Marlins 36 58 .383 20
D.C. Balk 37 61 .373 21.5
AL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Minnesota Twins 59 36 .621
Cleveland Indians 55 40 .579 4
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 49 46 .514 10.2
Chicago White Sox 42 51 .452 16
Bellingham Cascades 43 52 .451 16.2
Kansas City Royals 36 62 .367 24.5
Detroit Tigers 29 63 .315 28.5
NL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Chicago Cubs 52 44 .542
Milwaukee Brewers 51 47 .520 2
St. Louis Cardinals 49 46 .516 2.5
Pittsburgh Pirates 45 50 .474 6.5
Cottage Cheese 45 51 .466 7.3
Cincinnati Reds 43 51 .457 8
Brookland Outs 38 58 .400 13.6
AL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Houston Astros 61 37 .622
Oakland A’s 55 42 .567 5.5
Haviland Dragons 52 46 .526 9.4
Texas Rangers 50 46 .521 10
Los Angeles Angels 50 48 .510 11
Kaline Drive 48 50 .492 12.8
Seattle Mariners 39 60 .394 22.5
NL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Portland Rosebuds 64 35 .650
Los Angeles Dodgers 64 35 .646 0.3
Arizona Diamondbacks 49 48 .505 14.3
Peshastin Pears 50 49 .503 14.5
San Francisco Giants 48 49 .495 15.3
San Diego Padres 46 50 .479 16.8
Colorado Rockies 46 51 .474 17.3