League Updates

The Mystery of the Disappearing Offense

As I’ve worked with our stats this season, the feeling has been growing that our offense is down from last year.  So this morning I checked.

EFL average RC/G in 2017:   5.20

EFL average RC/G in 2018:  4.26

I was right!  We’re creating almost a full run per game less than we did last season.

Just to confirm my impression, I also checked our ERAs.

EFL average ERA in 2017:   4.11

EFL average ERA in 2018:  4.08

Woah!  That’s hardly any different. Our hitters are down a run a game, but our pitchers are doing about the same?  How can this be?

So I checked MLB’s numbers:

MLB RC/G    MLB ERA       EFL RC/G        EFL ERA

2017               4.65               4.35                   5.20                  4.11

2018              4.38               3.98                   4.26                  4.08

Our hitters last year created over half a run per game more than MLB hitters.  This attests to our superior lineups.  Our pitchers last year had ERA’s about a quarter of a run better than MLB pitchers. This also confirms our superiority, and explains how we averaged 94 wins per team last year.

But this year, so far, in 75 total games spread among the 11 of us, our hitters are 0.1 RC/G worse than the MLB average, and our pitchers are also 0.1 earned runs per game worse.  Suddenly we’re a little dumber than the average MLB team management?

DO NOT POINT YOUR FINGERS AT BROOKLAND!  They are soaring higher than most of us did as expansion teams. The Outs have not dumbed down the league. In fact, the evidence so far indicates the Outs will dominate us in a year or two.

Instead, point those accusing digits at the Commissioner. His competitive rebalancing program is working!  We apparently have surrendered a huge part of our former competitive advantage.

But the dumbness of our league, or of our Commissioner, is not the issue here. The issue is how to explain a huge decline in offense that registers as only a small decline in ERA.  MLB isn’t having this problem.  Its decline in offense is commensurate with its decline in ERA — the offensive decline is 0.3 runs per game. The pitching decline is 0.4 runs per game.  That small difference can be explained by cold weather. Errors are probably up a little, or a little more damaging, due to the very high percentage of games being played in wintry conditions so far.  If this is the explanation, ERA and RC/G should converge, at least as compared to 2017.

Apparently, tentatively, our rebalancing rules have moved our rosters much closer to MLB average. Somehow they had far more impact on our offense than on our pitching. Last year our advantage in pitching was substantial — a quarter of a run per game. But our advantage in hitting was unconscionable: more than half a run per game.

Now both advantages have been eliminated, at least in the very early going.  This shows up in our W/L records, too: as a league we are almost exactly at .500 (38-38).  Will our superior intellects impose themselves on reality, and restore us to our dominant positions as the season progresses?  And will we again find that easier to do on the offensive side? It will be interesting to see.

EFL Standings for 2018
EFL
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB RS RA
Old Detroit Wolverines 5 2 .690 29.2 19.6
Canberra Kangaroos 5 2 .687 42.2 28.5
Portland Rosebuds 4 3 .617 0.5 33.5 26.4
Kaline Drive 5 3 .595 0.6 35.6 29.4
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 4 2 .592 0.8 27.2 22.5
Brookland Outs 4 2 .585 0.8 29.3 24.7
D.C. Balk 3 4 .458 1.6 26.5 28.9
Flint Hill Tornadoes 3 4 .433 1.8 28.2 32.2
Cottage Cheese 2 4 .372 2.1 22.5 29.3
Haviland Dragons 2 6 .261 3.2 31.8 53.6
Peshastin Pears 1 6 .183 3.5 17.6 37.3
.
Old Detroit: DNP, 1 – 0. (.211, .400, .526; no pitching).  The Wolverines cling to their first-place perch thanks mainly to Carlos Gonzalez’  two for four with a triple and a homer. If the old CarGo can reawaken, this could be a fun season for the W’s.
.
Canberra:  W, 5 – 3. (.190, .292, .333; 3 ip, 0 er).  The ‘Roos couldn’t match the W’s offensive output, so they actually got some great pitching. And it was almost enough to sneak past the W’s and regain first place.  Man this is exciting! Nothing is better than a great Mock v. Mock rivalry atop the league!
.
Portland: W (-1), L 1; 1 -3. (.278, .333, .278;  12.3 ip, 9 er).  Thank God for German Marquez!  His 4.7 ip, 7 er outing forced the Rosebuds to keep their prickly stems out of the internecine battle atop the standings.  On the other hand, Jonathan Villar went two for three and is now batting .438, .438, .438 in April (.333, .333, .333 on the season).  Is the Kangaroo prophecy about to come true — will Villar recover his 2016 glory now that he’s been traded to the Rosebuds?
.
Kaline:  “W”, 2 – 4. (.214, .327, .214; 6 ip, 2 er). I talked briefly with Bruce Murphy at Melanie’s book launch event last night.  Bruce was shockingly familiar with our league.  It turns out he heard a lot about it from Tom while he and Michele were here for the free agent draft. Bruce revealed Kaline management is excited about the 2018 season, believing this iteration ofthe Drive is the best ever.
.
I told Bruce I agreed.  I started to tell him how I had helped the Drive build such a good team, but Bruce somehow let himself get distracted.  So he never heard how Steve Pearce and Jorge Soler, gift-wrapped by the Wolverines, would lead the Drive to September competitiveness. This was fortunate, since yesterday Soler and Pearce combined to go 0 for 7 (albeit with two walks). For the season so far Pearce is OPSing .523.  Soler is yet to get a hit; his 3 walks constitute his entire .200 OPS.
.
Pittsburgh:  W 1, L (-1); 0 – (-2). (.289, .300, .368; 7 IP, 1 ER). Marco Estrada continued the resurrection of his career with 6 strong innings (1 ER).  His season ERA is now 2.77.  Dansby Swanson did most of the damage at the plate: 3 for 5 with a double and a triple. His season OPS is now .926, second highest among the Alleghenys, even though he has yet to walk.
.
Brookland:  W 1, L (-1); 1 – (-2). (.261, .370, .565;  3 ip, 0 er). This Out team isn’t going away like a good expansion team should.  The problem this time was mostly the new Outs Superstar Manny Machado: 4 for 5 with two homers.  We are going to regret letting Manny be Manny in Brookland instead of some more established EFL venue.
.
DC: L, 3 – 3.  (.238, .304, .381;  6 ip, 2 er).  The Balk are getting feisty, too.  Matt Chapman, the first man on my draft list (assuming Bellinger and Hoskins were not going to fall to me), who had such a rough spring: this same Chapman hit a key homer and had another hit, and made some super defensive plays last night.  He also, alas, made a critical error which led to the Athletics losing their game … but I doubt this effect has reached, or will ever reach, DC.
.
Flint Hill: DNP, 1 – (-1). (.333, .429, .625;  1 ip, 0 er). I confess I don’t know how such a powerful offensive line didn’t result in more runs, even on an off-day. Part of it has to be this: Yangervis Solarte had the best day at the plate (1 for 2 with a homer and THREE walks) but he’s only allocated at 33%.
.
Cottage:  DNP, (-1) – 0. (.059, .200, .235;  5.7 ip, 3 er) Cheese Superstar Mike Trout hasn’t had a superstart so far, and yesterday didn’t help.  He went 0 for 4 with one intentional walk. (Intentional walks are worth a little less to us than regular walks, since they tend to be given deliberately in situations where walks are less valuable.)
 .
Haviland: L, 0 – 7. (.000, .056, .000;  1 ip, 0 er) A skeleton crew of 4 hitters went 0 for 17 with a HBP by Zack Cozart. The Dragons’ new superstar Bryce Harper, who IS off to a fine 1.342 OPS start, didn’t play last night.
.
Peshastin:  DNP, 1 – 2. (.24o, .296, .520; 1 ip, 2 er). The ascetic Pears have no superstars, although they have hopes that some (Ozzie Albies and Victor Robles being the most likely) will become so.  Speaking of Albies, he led the Pears Friday with a double and a homer in 5 at bats. This only lifted his season OPS to .7o6, but something tells me there’s no hurry this year.
.
Combined MLB + EFL Standings for 2018
AL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Boston Red Sox 6 1 .857
Old Detroit Wolverines 5 2 .690 1.2
Toronto Blue Jays 5 3 .625 1.5
New York Yankees 4 4 .500 2.5
Flint Hill Tornadoes 3 4 .433 3
Baltimore Orioles 3 5 .375 3.5
Tampa Bay Rays 1 6 .143 5
NL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
New York Mets 6 1 .857
Atlanta Braves 5 2 .714 1
Canberra Kangaroos 5 2 .687 1.2
Washington Nationals 4 3 .571 2
D.C. Balk 3 4 .458 2.8
Philadelphia Phillies 2 4 .333 3.5
Miami Marlins 2 5 .286 4
AL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Minnesota Twins 4 2 .667
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 4 2 .592 0.4
Chicago White Sox 3 3 .500 1
Cleveland Indians 3 4 .429 1.5
Detroit Tigers 2 4 .333 2
Kansas City Royals 1 4 .200 2.5
NL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Pittsburgh Pirates 5 1 .833
Milwaukee Brewers 5 3 .625 1
Brookland Outs 4 2 .585 1.5
St. Louis Cardinals 3 4 .429 2.5
Chicago Cubs 3 4 .429 2.5
Cottage Cheese 2 4 .372 2.8
Cincinnati Reds 1 5 .167 4
AL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Houston Astros 6 2 .750
Los Angeles Angels 6 2 .750
Kaline Drive 5 3 .595 1.2
Seattle Mariners 3 3 .500 2
Texas Rangers 3 6 .333 3.5
Oakland A’s 3 6 .333 3.5
Haviland Dragons 2 6 .261 3.9
NL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Arizona Diamondbacks 6 1 .857
Portland Rosebuds 4 3 .617 1.7
San Francisco Giants 3 3 .500 2.5
Colorado Rockies 4 4 .500 2.5
Los Angeles Dodgers 2 5 .286 4
San Diego Padres 2 6 .250 4.5
Peshastin Pears 1 6 .183 4.7