League Updates Uncategorized

Defeating League Excellence by Being a Team Player

This whole week I have been struck by how well EFL teams are doing, especially on offense. It seems like every day teams are scoring a lot of runs. Sometimes I feel a certain way but when I do a little research it isn’t backed up by the data. But this week, in the midst of these feelings, I ran across this MLB stat:

“The whole league is hitting .284/.355/.503 this week.”

That is an excellent slash line for an entire league – all 30 MLB teams combined. I wondered how that stat translated into our EFL world, so I did a tiny bit of math this morning (not sure how people do a lot of math in a morning, or even an entire day of math, but apparently some people do):

Month Runs
July 1,561
August 1,023

If my calculations are correct (which is certainly not a certainty) we are on pace for over 1,800 runs this month in the EFL. To make things even clearer, here is how it is impacting our winning percentage:

Month Win%
July .527
August .591

If you look at the current season standings page, you’ll see that a .591 winning percentage would put your team in 4th place overall, .001 percentage points behind the third place team, Old Detroit.

That is quite alarming. Offense is good for the game, or so we have been told. It has apparently been taken off the internet, but when I was a kid there was a Nike ad that featured Greg Maddux and Tom Glavine, watching Mark McGwire launch balls into the upper deck as Heather Locklear looked on, in awe. Maddux and Glavine were trying to get her attention, but she was unfazed by them. Maddux then turns to Glavine, shrugs his shoulders, and says, “Chicks dig the long balls” (please ignore the obvious misogyny).

But this kind of offensive output is not good for the game, nor for our league. Ron has already warned us what happens when his team does well (is this causation or correlation? We might never know), but I for one, don’t fancy an expansion team coming in stealing my favorite players, which is what will happen if we continue to hit like we are hitting.

So let’s take a little break, shall we? Just as Ron suggested yesterday we should be supple enough to shift our approach. Perhaps you should encourage your batters to bunt a little more often, to strikeout even more than they are, and to ground into a few more double plays. Perhaps, like the Pirates, such an admonition will cause some strife among your team, but even that will help to make things a little less scary (even though the Pirates won yesterday, a day after reports appeared of their dysfunction, they only scored 3 runs, which usually results in a loss).

EFL
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB RS RA
Portland Rosebuds 81 43 .652 768.0 559.6
Flint Hill Tornadoes 77 47 .622 3.7 776.2 602.1
Old Detroit Wolverines 73 51 .590 7.6 740.0 605.4
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 67 55 .551 12.6 630.5 562.2
Haviland Dragons 65 58 .529 15.3 701.9 649.8
Peshastin Pears 65 59 .525 15.7 648.6 616.6
Kaline Drive 62 61 .501 18.7 587.5 588.4
Canberra Kangaroos 60 64 .485 20.8 674.4 699.5
Cottage Cheese 55 65 .457 24 683.6 728.6
Bellingham Cascades 55 67 .452 24.8 588.4 651.3
Brookland Outs 51 69 .427 27.7 596.9 693.3
D.C. Balk 49 75 .395 31.9 563.1 699.2
Portland: W2, L-1 (12-1) (52 PA, .408, .442, .857; 12.3 ip, 2 er, 1.46 era) Well, here we are, first team in already blatant disrespect for our league as a whole. The ROsebuds had 13 players appear at the plate, and 10 of them OPSed over 1.000. Rude. And the pitchers? Stellar. All around a great day for Rosebuds, and a worse day for the rest of us…no matter how our teams did.
Flint Hill: W, 3-0 (.216, .286, .431; 17.3 ip, 7 er, 3.63 era) The Tornadoes did their part offensively, because we care about the league as a whole – we do! Our pitchers also care about our specific team, giving us what we have so far been missing this month – good pitching. It hurts to win and lose ground to the leader. It really hurts.
Old Detroit: L, 6-8 (.188, .328, .375; 4.7 ip, 4 er, 7.71 era) The Wolverines, too, are doing their part, and very convincingly. The Wolverine ownership sang Ahmed’s song yesterday, and he must have felt glad to be seen, because he again produced. But he was the only one. Maybe the Wolverine manager should sing everyone’s praises? On second thought, don’t do that.
Pittsburgh: L, 2-4 (.233, .273, .433; 3.3 ip, 0 er, 0.00 era) Look, Portland! It seems every team but you cares about keeping our league from an expansion draft. The Alleghanys not only had a lackluster offensive day, they lost their top performer on the day, Inciarte, to an injury. How about that for caring?
Haviland: L, 5-9 (38 PA, .242, .316, .424; 6.7 ip, 6 er, 8.10 era) The Dragons, team players that they have always been, contributed wonderfully to our league goals. Sean Newcomb really got into the spirit of things, coughing up 3 ER in 1/3 of an inning. If it weren’t for the two players with 4 letters in their last name (Wong and Puig) the Dragons would have really been team players!
Peshastin: W, 6-4 (38 PA, .300, .417, .433; 10.7 ip, 3 er, 2.53 era) Ok, it had to end somewhere, but we all know that Phil deserves to have some sunny days – shoot, he deserves have this sunny month he has been having. The pears on our pear tree outside our house are just about ripe and ready to be enjoyed, which seems fitting since Phil’s Pears are doing the same – creating enjoyment for him, even if not for the league as a whole.
Kaline: W, 8-8 (24 PA, .289, .333, .533; 13.3 ip, 8 er, 5.40 era) Kaline’s numbers are a great example of caring about the league. They are so even – the exact amount of runs scored as runs allowed, a .500 record. That’s a team player!
Canberra: L, 3-8 (33 PA, .207, .303, .207; .2 ip, 0 er, 0 era) The Kangaroos were ground animals yesterday, choosing to save the soaring heights for another day. But that is what we need! Good job, Roos.
Cottage: W, 7-6 (26 PA, .304, .385, .478; 1 ip, 0 er) I have to imagine the Cheese feel like they have played for the overall good of the league for a while now, and thus feel good about eking out a win yesterday.
Bellingham: L, 4-7 (21 PA, .286, .286, .571; .2 ip, 0 er)
Brookland: “L,” 7-6 (24 PA, .333, .333, .750; 1.3 ip, 0 er, 0 era)
DC: W, 9-6 (36 PA, .286, .306, .600; 11.3 ip, 2 er, 1.59 era)
I ran out of time – sorry!
Combined MLB + EFL Standings for 2014
AL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
New York Yankees 82 42 .661
Flint Hill Tornadoes 77 47 .622 4.9
Old Detroit Wolverines 73 51 .590 8.8
Tampa Bay Rays 71 52 .577 10.5
Boston Red Sox 65 59 .524 17
Toronto Blue Jays 52 73 .416 30.5
Baltimore Orioles 39 83 .320 42
NL East
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Atlanta Braves 72 52 .581
Washington Nationals 66 55 .545 4.5
Philadelphia Phillies 64 58 .525 7
New York Mets 62 60 .508 9
Canberra Kangaroos 60 64 .485 11.9
D.C. Balk 49 75 .395 23.1
Miami Marlins 45 76 .372 25.5
AL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Minnesota Twins 74 48 .607
Cleveland Indians 73 50 .593 1.5
Pittsburgh Alleghenys 67 55 .551 6.8
Chicago White Sox 55 66 .455 18.5
Bellingham Cascades 55 67 .452 18.9
Kansas City Royals 44 78 .361 30
Detroit Tigers 37 82 .311 35.5
NL Central
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
St. Louis Cardinals 64 56 .533
Chicago Cubs 64 58 .525 1
Milwaukee Brewers 63 59 .516 2
Cincinnati Reds 57 64 .471 7.5
Cottage Cheese 55 65 .457 9.2
Brookland Outs 51 69 .427 12.8
Pittsburgh Pirates 51 70 .421 13.5
AL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Houston Astros 78 45 .634
Oakland A’s 70 52 .574 7.5
Haviland Dragons 65 58 .529 12.9
Kaline Drive 62 61 .501 16.4
Texas Rangers 60 62 .492 17.5
Los Angeles Angels 60 64 .484 18.5
Seattle Mariners 50 73 .407 28
NL West
TEAM WINS LOSSES PCT. GB
Los Angeles Dodgers 82 42 .661
Portland Rosebuds 81 43 .652 1.2
Peshastin Pears 65 59 .525 16.9
San Francisco Giants 62 61 .504 19.5
Arizona Diamondbacks 61 62 .496 20.5
San Diego Padres 56 65 .463 24.5
Colorado Rockies 55 67 .451 26